Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A six-week, resource-efficient mobility program after discharge from rehabilitation improves standing in people affected by stroke: placebo-controlled, randomised trial |
McClellan R, Ada L |
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2004;50(3):163-167 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Although intervention is effective in reducing the disability associated with stroke, limited resources mean that physiotherapy services often cease by six months after stroke. The purpose of this clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy of resource-efficient physiotherapy services in improving mobility and quality of life after stroke. Twenty six people with residual walking difficulties after stroke were randomised into an experimental or control group after discharge from physiotherapy services. The experimental group participated in a sex-week, home-based mobility program. The control group participated in a six-week Subjects met with the therapist for prescription of exercises only three times during the six weeks. Strategies used to offset potential problems associated with minimal subject-therapist interaction included videotaped instructions to encourage correct performance of exercises, modification of the environment and involvement of carers to enhance safety, and telephone contact and self-monitoring to promote compliance. Standing (Functional Reach), walking (MAS Item 5) and quality of life (SA-SIP30) were measured prior to, immediately after, and two months after intervention ceased by an assessor who was blinded to group allocation. Subjects in the experimental group demonstrated significant improvement in standing compared to the control group (p = 0.01) which was maintained two months after the cessation of intervention (p = 0.04). There was no difference between the control groups in walking (p = 0.50) or quality of life (p = 0.70). The six-week, resource-efficient mobility program was effective in improving some of the mobility in people after discharge from stroke may continue rehabilitation for longer.
|