OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of augmented exercise therapy time for arm rehabilitation as either Bobath therapy or the impairment-oriented training (Arm BASIS training) in stroke patients with arm severe paresis. DESIGN: Single blind, multicentre randomized control trial. SETTING: Three inpatient neurorehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Sixty-two anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to three group: (A) no augmented exercise therapy time, (B) augmented exercise therapy time as Bobath therapy and (C) augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training. MAIN MEASURES: Main outcome measure: Fugl-Meyer arm motor score. Secondary measure: Action Research Arm Test (ARA). Ancillary measures: Fugl-Meyer arm sensation and joint motion/pain scores and the Ashworth Scale (elbow flexors). RESULTS: An overall effect of augmented exercise therapy time on Fugl-Meyer scores after four weeks was not corroborated (mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of change scores: no augmented exercise therapy time (n = 20) 8.8, 5.2 to 12.3; augmented exercise therapy time (n = 40) 9.9, 6.8 to 13.9; p = 0.2657). The group who received the augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training (n = 20) had, however, higher gains than the group receiving the augmented exercise therapy time as Bobath therapy (n = 20) (mean and 95% CI of change scores: Bobath 7.2, 2.6 to 11.8; BASIS 12.6, 8.4 to 16.8; p = 0.0432). Passive joint motion/pain deteriorated less in the group who received BASIS training (mean and 95% CI of change scores: Bobath -3.2, -5.2 to -1.1; BASIS 0.1, -1.8 to 2.0; p = 0.0090). ARA, Fugl-Meyer arm sensation, and Ashworth Scale scores were not differentially affected. CONCLUSIONS: The augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training enhanced selective motor control. Type of training was more relevant for recovery of motor control than therapeutic time spent.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher