Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis
Kivi P
Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1983;15(1):37-41
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The etiology of humeral epicondylitis and three different conservative methods of treatment were prospectively studied during two years in patients visiting a large occupational health center. Eighty-eight workers, 50 male and 38 female, out of 7,600 suffered from humeral epicondylitis. The annual incidence was 59 per 10,000 workers. The mean age was 43 years. The main cause (61.4%) of tennis elbow was over-exertion of the finger and wrist extensors in trained workers. Forty-seven patients were treated with local corticosteroid and anesthetic injections (beta-methasone+lidocaine), 20 patients with methylprednisolone injections and 21 patients with wrist immobilization in combination with indomethacin. The result of therapy was excellent or good in 82% of the cases after six months and in 90% after one year. No significant differences (p > 0.1) in results were observed between patients treated with different therapies. Two patients (2.3%) were operated on after conservative treatment had failed.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help