Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction
Oldridge N, Guyatt G, Jones N, Crowe J, Singer J, Feeny D, McKelvie R, Runions J, Streiner D, Torrance G
The American Journal of Cardiology 1991 May 15;67(13):1084-1089
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This investigation was designed to determine the impact of a brief period of cardiac rehabilitation, initiated within 6 weeks of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), on both disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life, exercise tolerance and return to work after AMI. With a stratified, parallel group design, 201 low-risk patients with evidence of depression or anxiety, or both, after AMI, were randomized to either an 8-week program of exercise conditioning and behavioral counseling or to conventional care. Although the differences were small, significantly greater improvement was seen in rehabilitation group patients at 8 weeks in the emotions dimension of a new disease-specific, health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire, in their state of anxiety and in exercise tolerance. All measures of health-related quality of life in both groups improved significantly over the 12-month follow-up period. However, the 95% confidence intervals around differences between groups at the 12-month follow-up effectively excluded sustained, clinically important benefits of rehabilitation in disease-specific (limitations -2.70 to 1.40; emotions -4.86 to 1.10, where negative values favor conventional care and positive values favor rehabilitation) and generic health-related quality of life (time trade-off -0.062 to 0.052; quality of well-being -0.042 to 0.035) or in exercise tolerance (-38.5 to 52.1 kpm/min); also, return to work was similar in the 2 groups (relative risk 0.93; confidence interval 0.71 to 1.64).
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help