Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) [with consumer summary]
Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Wingendorf I, Hoolig G, Koch R, Hesse S
Clinical Rehabilitation 2007 Jan;21(1):17-27
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of repetitive locomotor training on an electromechanical gait trainer plus physiotherapy in subacute stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four German neurological rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty-five non-ambulatory patients (first-time stroke < 60 days). INTERVENTION: Group A received 20 min locomotor training and 25 min physiotherapy; group B had 45 min physiotherapy every week day for four weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary variables were gait ability (Functional Ambulation Category, 0 to 5) and the Barthel Index (0 to 100), blindly assessed at study onset, end, and six months later for follow-up. Responders to the therapy had to become ambulatory (Functional Ambulation Category 4 or 5) or reach a Barthel Index of >= 75. Secondary variables were walking velocity, endurance, mobility and leg power. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that significantly greater number of patients in group A could walk independently: 41 of 77 versus 17 of 78 in group B (p < 0.0001) at treatment end. Also, significantly more group A patients had reached a Barthel Index >= 75: 44 of 77 versus 21 of 78 (p < 0.0001). At six-month follow-up, the superior gait ability in group A persisted (54 of 77 versus 28 of 78, p < 0.0001), while the Barthel Index responder rate did not differ. For all secondary variables, group A patients had improved significantly more (p < 0.0001) during the treatment period, but not during follow-up. CONCLSUSIONS: Intensive locomotor training plus physiotherapy resulted in a significantly better gait ability and daily living competence in subacute stroke patients compared with physiotherapy alone.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help