Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Lokomotionstherapie des akuten schlaganfallpatienten: ergebnisse der multizentrischen deutschen gangtrainer studie (DEGAS) (Locomotor training in subacute stroke patients: results of a multicenter study (DEGAS)) [German] |
Werner C, Pohl M, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Holig G, Koch R, Hesse S |
Neurologie und Rehabilitation 2006 Nov;12(5):262-269 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of repetitive locomotor training on an electromechanical gait trainer plus physiotherapy in subacute stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four German neurological rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: 155 non-ambulatory patients (first-time stroke < 60 days). INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to group A and B. Group A received 20 min locomotor training plus 25 min physiotherapy, and group B 45 min physiotherapy every workday for four weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary variables were gait ability (Functional Ambulation Category, 0 to 5) and the Barthel Index (0 to 100), blindly assessed at study onset, end, and six months later for follow-up Responders to the therapy had to become ambulatory (Functional Ambulation Category 4 or 5) or reach a Barthel Index of >= 75. Secondary variables were walking velocity, endurance, mobility, and leg power. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that significantly greater numbers of patients in group A could walk independently: 41 of 77 versus 17 of 78 in group B (p < 0.0001) at treatment end. Also, significantly more A-patients had reached a Barthel Index >= 75: 44 of 77 versus 21 of 78 (p < 0.0001). At the end of a 6 month follow-up, the superior gait ability in group A persisted (54 of 77 versus 28 of 78, p < 0.0001), while the Barthel Index responder rate did not differ. For all secondary variables, group A patients had improved significantly more (p < 0.0001) during the treatment period, but not during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Intensive locomotor training plus physiotherapy resulted in a significantly better gait ability and daily living competence in subacute stroke patients as compared to physiotherapy alone. More intense gait practice most likely explained the superior result.
|