Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Rehabilitacion cardiaca en pacientes con infarto de miocardio. Resultados tras 10 anos de seguimiento (Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with myocardial infarction: a 10-year follow-up study) [Spanish]
Maroto Montero JM, Ramirez RA, Morales Duran MD, de Pablo Zarzosa C, Abraira V
Revista Espanola de Cardiologia 2005 Oct;58(10):1181-1187
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Very little information is available on the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs on long-term survival. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of a structured cardiac rehabilitation program on mortality in patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction. The secondary endpoint was the effect on morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study included 180 low-risk male patients aged under 65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: 90 entered into a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program, and 90 served as a control group. The mean follow-up period was 10 years. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group: the 10-year survival rate was 91.8% in the intervention group compared with 81.7% in the control group (p = 0.04). There was also a decrease in cardiovascular mortality, though it was not statistically significant: the 10-year survival rate was 91.8% in the intervention group compared with 83.8% in the control group (p = 0.10). The incidence of non-fatal complications was lower in the intervention group (35.2% versus 63.2%, p = 0.03), as was the incidence of unstable angina (15.7% versus 33.9%, p = 0.02) and cardiac heart failure (3.0% versus 14.4%, p = 0.02), and the need for coronary intervention (8.4% versus 22.9%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program significantly decreased long-term mortality and morbidity in low-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help