Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Normalization of diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetics after exercise training
Brassard P, Legault S, Garneau C, Bogaty P, Dumesnil J-G, Poirier P
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2007 Nov;39(11):1896-1901
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of aerobic exercise training on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and exercise capacity in subjects with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-three sedentary subjects with well-controlled type 2 diabetes, free of coronary disease and having different degrees of LVDD, participated in the study. Subjects were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents and/or diet. Eleven subjects (EX) (age 58 +/- 5 yr; mean +/- SD) underwent a 3-month aerobic exercise training program using a cycle ergometer, whereas a control group (CONT) of 12 subjects (57 +/- 6 yr) maintained their activities of daily living. Exercise capacity and LVDD, using echocardiography, were evaluated before and after the 3-month exercise program. RESULTS: At baseline, anthropometric data were similar between the groups, except for body mass index (BMI), which was higher in CONT (31 +/- 3 versus 28+/- 3 kg/m; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in glycemic control (HbA1c: 6.4 +/- 1.2 versus 5.8 +/- 1.3%; p = 0.2) or maximal oxygen uptake (26.7 +/- 5.9 versus 28.6 +/- 3.9 mL/kg/min; p = 0.4) between groups. Normalization of LVDD was observed in 5 of 11 EX subjects (p < 0.0001) of whom four had grade 1 LVDD before exercise training. No change in diastolic function was observed in the CONT group. After exercise training, maximal oxygen uptake increased in the EX group (28.6 +/- 3.9 versus 32.7 +/- 5.7 mL/kg/min; p < 0.05), whereas there was no change in the CONT group (26.7 +/- 5.9 versus 27.3 +/- 6.2 mL/kg/min; p = 0.58). In both groups, there was no significant change in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Along with an improvement in exercise capacity, aerobic exercise training has the potential to reverse LVDD in patients with well-controlled, uncomplicated type 2 diabetes.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help