Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of recommended positioning on stroke outcome at six months: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Jones A, Tilling K, Wilson-Barnett J, Newham DJ, Wolfe CD
Clinical Rehabilitation 2005 Mar;19(2):138-145
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on patient outcome of a teaching package for nurses designed to improve the positioning of stroke patients. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up. SETTING: Ten stroke rehabilitation hospital units located within one UK inner city region. These were randomized to control or intervention group. SUBJECTS: A sample of 120 patients admitted within four weeks of a first stroke and with a hemiplegia. No eligible patient refused to participate. Eighty-three (69%) completed the study. INTERVENTION: All nursing staff on the intervention units received a group teaching package to improve their clinical practice in patient positioning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) at six months post stroke. Patient's position was recorded using an established observational tool. RESULTS: After the teaching there was some evidence of better positioning in the intervention than the control group (difference in percentage of correct positions per patient 4.9%, 95% confidence interval (Cl -0.1% to 9.9%, p = 0.055). There was no evidence of differences between the two groups in any of the outcome measures at six months although there was a trend towards increased elbow flexor tone in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A teaching intervention to improve patient positioning made no significant impact on outcome at six months post stroke. However, following the teaching there was only a slightly higher incidence of recommended patient positioning within the intervention group. Thus, a teaching package may not be powerful enough to enable any effect on patient outcome to be measured.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help