Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke [with consumer summary]
Lord S, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M
Clinical Rehabilitation 2008 Mar;22(3):215-225
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated an assistant-led, community-based intervention to improve community mobility and participation after stroke, and examined the potential for independent community ambulation in people with subacute stroke who present with moderate gait deficit. DESIGN: A multicentre, pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three hospitals and three community settings in New Zealand. SUBJECTS: Thirty post-acute, home-dwelling stroke survivors were randomly allocated to receive intervention in the community (n = 14) or as hospital outpatients (n = 16) twice a week for seven weeks. INTERVENTIONS: The community intervention involved practice of functional gait activities in community environments relevant to each participant. Hospital-based physiotherapy was based upon a motor relearning approach. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was gait speed (m/min). Secondary outcomes included endurance (six-minute walk time), Activities-specific Confidence Balance Scale, and the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes measured at baseline, post intervention and six months. RESULTS: Large gains in gait speed were obtained for participants in both groups: community group mean (SD) 16 (16.1) m/min; physiotherapy group mean (SD) 15.9 (16.1) m/min, maintained at six months. There were no significant differences between groups for primary and secondary outcomes after treatment (p = 0.86 ANOVA) or at six months (p = 0.83 ANOVA). Only 11 participants reported independent community ambulation. Levels of social integration were low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based gait recovery programme appears a practicable alternative to routine physiotherapy, however independent community ambulation is a challenging rehabilitation goal.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help