Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke [with consumer summary] |
Lord S, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2008 Mar;22(3):215-225 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated an assistant-led, community-based intervention to improve community mobility and participation after stroke, and examined the potential for independent community ambulation in people with subacute stroke who present with moderate gait deficit. DESIGN: A multicentre, pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three hospitals and three community settings in New Zealand. SUBJECTS: Thirty post-acute, home-dwelling stroke survivors were randomly allocated to receive intervention in the community (n = 14) or as hospital outpatients (n = 16) twice a week for seven weeks. INTERVENTIONS: The community intervention involved practice of functional gait activities in community environments relevant to each participant. Hospital-based physiotherapy was based upon a motor relearning approach. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was gait speed (m/min). Secondary outcomes included endurance (six-minute walk time), Activities-specific Confidence Balance Scale, and the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes measured at baseline, post intervention and six months. RESULTS: Large gains in gait speed were obtained for participants in both groups: community group mean (SD) 16 (16.1) m/min; physiotherapy group mean (SD) 15.9 (16.1) m/min, maintained at six months. There were no significant differences between groups for primary and secondary outcomes after treatment (p = 0.86 ANOVA) or at six months (p = 0.83 ANOVA). Only 11 participants reported independent community ambulation. Levels of social integration were low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based gait recovery programme appears a practicable alternative to routine physiotherapy, however independent community ambulation is a challenging rehabilitation goal.
|