Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
No difference between wearing a night splint and standing on a tilt table in preventing ankle contracture early after stroke: a randomised trial |
Robinson W, Smith R, Aung O, Ada L |
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2008;54(1):33-38 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
QUESTION: Is wearing a night splint as effective as standing on a tilt table in preventing ankle dorsiflexion contracture and promoting the ability to stand up early after stroke? DESIGN: Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 30 patients undergoing rehabilitation who were not yet walking and within three weeks of their first stroke. INTERVENTION: For four weeks, one group wore a splint with the affected ankle at plantargrade, 7 nights per week, while the other group stood on a tilt table for 30 min with the ankle at maximum dorsiflexion, 5 times per week. This was followed by a period of no intervention for six weeks. Both groups received inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation emphasising mobility. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was contracture measured as maximum passive ankle dorsiflexion. RESULTS: The night splint group had the same amount of ankle dorsiflexion as the tilt table group by week 4 (mean difference 1 deg, 95% CI -5 to 7), and by week 10 (mean difference 3.5 deg, 95% CI -3 to 10). CONCLUSION: When added to early rehabilitation, wearing a night splint on the affected ankle in stroke patients appears to be as effective as standing on a tilt table in preventing contracture at the ankle. However, since there was no control group, the prevention of contracture may have been due to other factors.
|