Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Upper-body progressive resistance training improves strength and household physical activity performance in women attending cardiac rehabilitation
Coke LA, Staffileno BA, Braun LT, Gulanick M
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):238-245
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of moderate-intensity, progressive, upper-body resistance training (RT) on muscle strength and perceived performance of household physical activities (HPA) among women in cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: The 10-week, pretest-posttest, experiment randomized women to either usual care (UC) aerobic exercise or RT. Muscle strength for 5 upper-body RT exercises (chest press, shoulder press, biceps curl, lateral row, and triceps extension) was measured using the 1-Repetition Maximum Assessment. The RT group progressively increased weight lifted using 40%, 50%, and 60% of obtained 1-Repetition Maximum Assessment at 3-week intervals. Perceived performance of HPA was measured with the Kimble Household Activities Scale. RESULTS: The RT group (n = 16, mean age 64 +/- 11) significantly increased muscle strength in all 5 exercises in comparison with the UC group (n = 14, mean age 65 +/- 10) (chest press, 18% versus 11%; shoulder press, 24% versus 14%; biceps curl, 21% versus 12%; lateral row, 32% versus 9%; and triceps extension, 28% versus 20%, respectively). By study end, Household Activities Scale scores significantly increased (F = 13.878, p = 0.001) in the RT group (8.75 +/- 3.19 versus 11.25 +/- 2.14), whereas scores in the UC group decreased (8.60 +/- 3.11 versus 6.86 +/- 4.13). CONCLUSION: Progressive upper-body RT in women shows promise as an effective tool to increase muscle strength and improve the ability to perform HPA after a cardiac event. Beginning RT early after a cardiac event in a monitored cardiac rehabilitation environment can maximize the strengthening benefit.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help