Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on angiogenic cytokines in postinfarction patients |
Lee B-C, Hsu H-C, Tseng W-YI, Su M-YM, Chen S-Y, Wu Y-W, Chien K-L, Chen M-F |
Heart 2009 Jun;95(12):1012-1018 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cardiac rehabilitation influences plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines and their correlation with myocardial blood flow (MBF). DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary cardiac centre. PATIENTS: 39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n = 20) or a non-training group (n = 19), and 19 normal controls. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MBF by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and plasma levels of stem cell factor (SCF), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) measured at enrolment and at 3 months after randomisation. RESULTS: At baseline, when compared with the healthy subjects, postinfarction patients had a lower MBF in the infarcted myocardium during dipyridamole-induced stress (1.65 (0.58) versus 2.77 (0.78) ml/min/g, p < 0.001) but higher plasma levels of VEGF (3.65 (0.75) versus 2.77 (0.59) pg/ml, p < 0.001 expressed as the natural logarithm) and SDF-1 (2,113 (345) versus 1,869 (309) pg/ml, p = 0.009). Only SDF-1 was inversely associated with stress MBF in both remote (r = -0.39, p = 0.03) and infarcted myocardium (r = -0.62, p < 0.001). After 3 months, the training group's stress MBF had increased by 33% in the remote (p < 0.001) and 28% in infarcted myocardium (p = 0.02), while VEGF decreased by 9% (p = 0.01), and SDF-1 decreased by 11% (p = 0.02). The change in SDF-1 was inversely correlated with the change in stress MBF in both remote (r = -0.40, p = 0.01) and infarcted myocardium (r = -0.50, p = 0.001). In the non-training group, MBF and cytokines were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Cardiac rehabilitation improves stress MBF in postinfarction patients, with an inverse decrease in circulating angiogenic cytokines.
|