Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of muscle electrical stimulation on peak VO2 in cardiac transplant patients
Vaquero AF, Chicharro JL, Gil L, Ruiz MP, Sanchez V, Lucia A, Urrea S, Gomez MA
International Journal of Sports Medicine 1998 Jul;19(5):317-322
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) has become a critical component in the evaluation of heart transplant recipients (HTR). In these patients, peak VO2 remains low after cardiac transplantation mainly because of persisting peripheral limitations in the working muscles. Muscular electrical stimulation, on the other hand, has been shown to enhance the oxidative capacity of healthy muscle. It was the purpose of our investigation to study the effects of ES on the peak VO2 of HTR. Fourteen (11 males and 3 females) HTR (age 57 +/- 7 yr, mean +/- SD; height 163 +/- 7 cm, weight 70.5 +/- 8.6 kg) were selected as subjects and each of them was randomly assigned to one of two groups: (a) group EXP (n = 7), receiving electrical stimulation on both quadriceps muscles during a period of 8 weeks, and (b) group CONT (n = 7), not receiving electrical stimulation. Before (PRE) and after (POST) the aforementioned 8-week period, respectively, all the subjects performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test (ramp protocol) on a cycle ergometer for peak VO2 determination. PRE values of peak VO2 were similar in both groups (17.1 +/- 2.0 versus 16.9 +/- 3.8 ml/kg/min in EXP and CONT, respectively). However, peak values of VO2 significantly increased in EXP (p < 0.05) after the period of electrical stimulation (post peak VO2 18.7 +/- 2.0 ml/kg), whereas no change was observed in CONT (post peak VO2 16.2 +/- 3.2 ml/kg/min). In conclusion, electrical stimulation could therefore be used to improve the functional capacity of HTR, and might be included in the rehabilitation programs of this population group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help