Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The effects of additional care by a pulmonary nurse for asthma and COPD patients at a respiratory outpatient clinic: results from a double blind, randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
Rootmensen GN, van Keimpema ARJ, Looysen EE, van der Schaaf L, de Haan RJ, Jansen HM |
Patient Education and Counseling 2008 Feb;70(2):179-186 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of additional information based nursing care program in the treatment of asthma and COPD patients at a pulmonary outpatient clinic. METHODS: In a double blind, randomized clinical trial, 191 patients were allocated to an additional care group or control group. Patients in the intervention group received a protocol-based education program on individual basis by a pulmonary nurse on individual basis (average duration 60 min per patient). All patients were masked for the trial objectives. Effectiveness was expressed in terms of knowledge, inhalation technique, self-management, exacerbation rate (primary outcomes), and health-related quality of life and satisfaction with care received (secondary outcomes). The time interval between the initial and final assessments was 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were randomized into the additional care group and 94 into the control group, of which 157 had a complete dataset. (Un)adjusted analyses did not show differences between treatment groups in terms of knowledge, inhalation technique, self-management, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with care. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for baseline covariates showed a significant treatment effect with regard to exacerbation rate (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence limits 0.13/0.94, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: With the exception of exacerbation rate, we could not demonstrate efficacy of additional nursing care in a broad range of outcome parameters. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: At present we do not recommend to implement our patient-tailored education program in daily practice.
|