Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Efficacy of an insole shoe wedge and augmented pressure sensor for gait training in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Sungkarat S, Fisher BE, Kovindha A |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2010 Apr;25(4):360-369 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether external feedback to promote symmetrical weight distribution during standing and walking would improve gait performance and balance in people with stroke. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit and physical therapy department. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five individuals with stroke (mean (SD) age 53.0 (9.3) years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 17) or control group (n = 18). Time post stroke was less than six months for most subjects (n = 27, 77%). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects participated in 15 rehabilitation sessions including 30 minutes of gait retraining per session. During gait retraining, the experimental group used an insole shoe wedge and sensors set-up (I-ShoWS) while the control group received a conventional programme. The I-ShoWS set-up consisted of a wedge insole and a footswitch for the non-paretic leg and a pressure sensor on the paretic leg. OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait speed, step length and single support time asymmetry ratio, balance and amount of load on paretic leg during stance were evaluated twice: one day before and after training. RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated significant increase in standing and gait symmetry compared with the control group (p < 0.05). They demonstrated 3 times greater improvement in gait speed than the control group (p = 0.02). Balance improvement was significantly greater for the experimental than for the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gait retraining using the I-ShoWS set-up was more effective in restoration of gait speed, standing and walking symmetry and balance than a conventional treatment programme. These results indicate the benefit of implementing feedback during gait retraining.
|