Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Efficacy of an insole shoe wedge and augmented pressure sensor for gait training in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Sungkarat S, Fisher BE, Kovindha A |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2010 Apr;25(4):360-369 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether external feedback to promote symmetrical weight distribution during standing and walking would improve gait performance and balance in people with stroke. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit and physical therapy department. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five individuals with stroke (mean (SD) age 53.0 (9.3) years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 17) or control group (n = 18). Time post stroke was less than six months for most subjects (n = 27, 77%). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects participated in 15 rehabilitation sessions including 30 minutes of gait retraining per session. During gait retraining, the experimental group used an insole shoe wedge and sensors set-up (I-ShoWS) while the control group received a conventional programme. The I-ShoWS set-up consisted of a wedge insole and a footswitch for the non-paretic leg and a pressure sensor on the paretic leg. OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait speed, step length and single support time asymmetry ratio, balance and amount of load on paretic leg during stance were evaluated twice: one day before and after training. RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated significant increase in standing and gait symmetry compared with the control group (p < 0.05). They demonstrated 3 times greater improvement in gait speed than the control group (p = 0.02). Balance improvement was significantly greater for the experimental than for the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Gait retraining using the I-ShoWS set-up was more effective in restoration of gait speed, standing and walking symmetry and balance than a conventional treatment programme. These results indicate the benefit of implementing feedback during gait retraining.
|