Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Gunstige effecten van adem -- en ontspanningsinstructie in de hartrevalidatie: een gerandomiseerd follow-uponderzoek gedurende 5 jaar (Favorable effects of breathing and relaxation instructions in heart rehabilitation: a randomized 5-year follow-up study) [Dutch]
van Dixhoorn J
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1997;141(11):530-534
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Favourable effects of breathing and relaxation instructions in cardiac rehabilitation: A 5-year randomised follow-up and relaxation instruction of patients after a myocardial infarction on the occurrence of cardiac events during 5 years. DESGIN: Prospective randomised. SETTING: Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands. METHOD: In the period 1981 to 1983, 156 myocardial infarction patients were randomly assigned to either rehabilitation plus relaxation therapy (six weekly sessions of breathing and relaxation instruction (n = 76) or cardiac events and the amount of medical consumption of the two treatments was compared during 5 years. RESULTS: At five-year follow-up, 12 cardiac deaths had occurred, 5 in the relaxation group and 7 in the control group, re-infarction was observed in 10 and 12 patients, and cardiac surgery was performed in 2 an 11 respectively. In total, 15 (20%) and 26 patients (33%), respectively had at least one of these events (odds ratio (OR)) for the relaxation group: 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25 to 1.06. Medical consumption (counted as cardiac events and cardiac hospitalisations) was 30 patients (39%), experiencing 52 cardiac events in the relaxation group, for which the patients were hospitalised for a total of 476 days, and 38 patients (48%) experiencing 78 cardiac events in the control group (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.36) with a total of 719 hospitalisation days; the total number of hospitalisations was reduced by 31% by relaxation instruction. CONCLUSION: In the long run, the disease course after myocardial infarction is probably influenced favourably by adding relaxation instruction to cardiac rehabilitation. The extra costs are compensated for be a decrease in hospitalisation for cardiac problems.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help