Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of community-based ambulation training for walking function of post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial [with consumer summary] |
Park H-J, Oh D-W, Kim S-Y, Choi J-D |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2011 May;25(5):451-459 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of community-based ambulation training on walking function of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind, controlled pilot study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five subjects were randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group, with 13 and 12 subjects, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received a routine physical therapy. The subjects in the experimental group also received community-based ambulation training, which was performed for an hour, once a day, three times a week for a four-week period. MAIN MEASURES: Ten-metre walk test, 6-minute walk test, community walk test, walking ability questionnaire and activities-specific balance confidence scale before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The change values of the 10-m walk test (0.21 +/- 0.12m/s versus 0.07 +/- 0.10m/s), community walk test (-13.61 +/- 10.31minutes versus -3.27 +/- 11.99minutes), walking ability questionnaire (6.15 +/- 3.60 score versus 2.75 +/- 2.38 score) and activities-specific balance confidence scale (17.45 +/- 11.55 score versus 2.55 +/- 10.14 score) were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). At post-test, the 10-m walk test was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (0.72 +/- 0.24m/s versus 0.50 +/- 0.23m/s) (p < 0.05). In the experimental group, there were significant differences for all variables between pre-test and post-test (p < 0.01), whereas the subjects of the control group showed a significant difference in only the walking ability questionnaire (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that community-based ambulation training can be helpful in improving walking ability of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis and may be used as a practical adjunct to routine rehabilitation therapy.
|