Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison [with consumer summary] |
Geroin C, Picelli A, Munari D, Waldner A, Tomelleri C, Smania N |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2011 Jun;25(6):537-548 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether robot-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation is more effective than robot-assisted gait training alone or conventional walking rehabilitation for improving walking ability in stroke patients. DESIGN: Pilot randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty patients with chronic stroke. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received ten 50-minute treatment sessions, five days a week, for two consecutive weeks. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent a robot-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation; group 2 (n = 10) underwent a robot-assisted gait training combined with sham transcranial direct current stimulation; group 3 (n = 10) performed overground walking exercises. MAIN MEASURES: Patients were evaluated before, immediately after and two weeks post treatment. Primary outcomes: six-minute walking test, 10-m walking test. RESULTS: No differences were found between groups 1 and 2 for all primary outcome measures at the after treatment and follow-up evaluations. A statistically significant improvement was found after treatment in performance on the six-minute walking test and the 10-m walking test in favour of group 1 (six-minute walking test: 205.20 +/- 61.16m; 10-m walking test: 16.20 +/- 7.65s) and group 2 (six-minute walking test: 182.5 +/- 69.30m; 10-m walking test: 17.71 +/- 8.20s) compared with group 3 (six-minute walking test: 116.30 +/- 75.40m; 10-m walking test: 26.30 +/- 14.10s). All improvements were maintained at the follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: In the present pilot study transcranial direct current stimulation had no additional effect on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke. Larger studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.
|