Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Facilitation of motor and balance recovery by thermal intervention for the paretic lower limb of acute stroke: a single-blind randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary]
Chen J-C, Lin C-H, Wei Y-C, Hsiao J, Liang C-C
Clinical Rehabilitation 2011 Sep;25(9):823-832
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of thermal stimulation accompanied by either active or passive movement added to standard rehabilitation in facilitating motor and balance function of the paretic leg of acute stroke. DESIGN: Pilot, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Department of rehabilitation medicine in a general hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled within four weeks of the onset of a stroke causing moderate to severe leg paresis (Brunnstrom stage <= III). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to thermal (standard rehabilitation plus approximately 30 to 40 minutes of thermal stimulation therapy daily for six weeks) and control (standard rehabilitation only) groups. MAIN MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer lower extremity score, Medical Research Council scale for lower extremity, Modified Motor Assessment Scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients Trunk Control, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulation Classification and Modified Ashworth Scale. RESULTS: Patients in the thermal group experienced significantly better median scores for Fugl-Meyer lower extremity (14.0; interquartile range 10.5 to 15.5), Medical Research Council scale for lower extremity (6.0; 4.0 to 7.0), Modified Motor Assessment Scale (16.0; 12.5 to 18.5), Berg Balance Scale (28.0; 20.5 to 33.5), and Functional Ambulation Classification (2.0; 2.0 to 2.0) (all p < 0.05). The thermal group also had more independent walkers (15/17; 88.2%) than the control group (9/16; 56.3%) after six weeks (p = 0.06). No adverse effect occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal stimulation accompanied by either manual facilitation or encouragement for active participation of the paretic lower limb may be an effective promising supplementary treatment for the early-phase rehabilitation of moderate to severe stroke that warrants additional study.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help