Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of peer led programme for asthma education in adolescents: cluster randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Shah S, Peat JK, Mazurski EJ, Wang H, Sindhusake D, Bruce C, Henry RL, Gibson PG
BMJ 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):583-585
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a peer led programme for asthma education on quality of life and related morbidity in adolescents with asthma. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six high schools in rural Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 272 students with recent wheeze, recruited from a cohort of 1515 students from two school years (mean age 12.5 and 15.5 years); 251 (92.3%) completed the study. INTERVENTION: A structured education programme for peers comprising three steps (the "Triple A Program"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life, school absenteeism, asthma attacks, and lung function. RESULTS: When adjusted for year and sex, mean total quality of life scores showed significant improvement in the intervention than control group. Clinically important improvement in quality of life (> 0.5 units) occurred in 25% of students with asthma in the intervention group compared with 12% in the control group (p = 0.01). The number needed to treat was 8 (95% confidence interval 4.5 to 35.7). The effect of the intervention was greatest in students in year 10 and in females. Significant improvements occurred in the activities domain (41% versus 28%) and in the emotions domain (39% versus 19%) in males in the intervention group. School absenteeism significantly decreased in the intervention group only. Asthma attacks at school increased in the control group only. CONCLUSION: The triple A programme leads to a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life and related morbidity in students with asthma. Wider dissemination of this programme in schools could play an important part in reducing the burden of asthma in adolescents.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help