Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Evaluation of the Fight Asthma Now (FAN) program to improve asthma knowledge in urban youth and teenagers
Mosnaim GS, Li H, Damitz M, Sharp LK, Li Z, Talati A, Mirza F, Richardson D, Rachelefsky G, Africk J, Powell LH
Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 2011 Oct;107(4):310-316
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: School-based asthma education programs targeting disadvantaged youth and teens with asthma are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the Fight Asthma Now (FAN) educational program among 2 populations of predominantly low-income minority students: youth (3rd to 6th graders) and teens (7th to 8th graders). METHODS: Chicago-area elementary schools were invited to participate in this stratified 2-arm study. Eligible schools were assigned to participate either in the intervention or in the control arm. Within each participating school, eligible students were recruited and grouped (stratified by grade and age) to form teen or youth classes. Participants completed a pre- and post-intervention asthma knowledge questionnaire and observation for spacer technique competency. The treatment group received the FAN curriculum between the evaluations. RESULTS: A sample of 26 low-income, predominantly minority-serving schools was recruited. Most participating schools were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to form 25 youth classes (19 intervention and 6 control group) and 16 teen classes (11 intervention and 5 control group), resulting in 275 versus 69 youth and 141 versus 51 teens in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Stratified analyses were performed, and clustering within the school and class was taken into consideration in analyses. Multilevel models adjusting for school, class, ethnicity, sex, and pretest score indicate that the FAN intervention significantly increased both knowledge and spacer competency test scores, among both the youth and teen participants (p = 0.011 with respect to knowledge score among teen students, p < 0.0001 for all other cases). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that FAN significantly increases asthma knowledge and spacer technique competency within this high-risk population.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help