Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Chronic disease self-management program for low back pain in the elderly
Haas M, Groupp E, Muench J, Kraemer D, Brummel-Smith K, Sharma R, Ganger B, Attwood M, Fairweather A
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2005 May;28(4):228-237
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Stanford's Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) for chronic low back pain (LBP) in older Americans. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Community-based program offered at 12 locations. SUBJECTS: Community-dwelling seniors (n = 109) aged 60 and older with chronic LBP of mechanical origin. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to the CDSMP or to a 6-month, wait-list control group. The program included one 2.5-hour session per week for 6 weeks. Outcomes evaluated at 6 months included 100-point modified Von Korff pain and disability scales; days with pain and disability; SF-36 general health, energy-fatigue, and emotional well-being scales; 2 scales from the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, self-care attitudes/behaviors, and health services utilization. RESULTS: For pain at 6 months, the primary outcome, the adjusted mean difference between the program and control, was -1.0 (p = 0.835). There was a sizable advantage for the program in disability averaged over the course of the entire 6-month study (-9.2, p = 0.027), but not at the 6-month follow-up (-5.8, p = 0.278). There was an interaction between intervention and baseline disability days favoring the program for higher baseline values (p = 0.007). The CDSMP affected emotional well-being (7.6, p = 0.037) and energy-fatigue (5.1, p = 0.274). There were no differences for self-efficacy, pain days, and general health. CONCLUSION: There was no advantage for the CDSMP over a wait-list control for improving pain, general health, self-efficacy, and self-care attitudes in older Americans with chronic LBP. A benefit was suggested for emotional well-being, fatigue, functional disability, and days with disability.
Reprinted from the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics with copyright permission from the National University of Health Sciences.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help