Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Usefulness of the 6-minute walk test and the 200-metre fast walk test to individualize high intensity interval and continuous exercise training in coronary artery disease patients after acute coronary syndrome: a pilot controlled clinical study [with consumer summary]
Gremeaux M, Hannequin A, Laurent Y, Laroche D, Casillas JM, Gremeaux V
Clinical Rehabilitation 2011 Sep;25(9):844-855
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of three individualized exercise training prescriptions using either a percentage of maximal heart rate (HR), maximal 6-minute walk test (6MWT) HR, or maximal 200-metre fast walk test (200-mFWT) HR, on walking performance and exercise capacity in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. DESIGN: Controlled clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven outpatients enrolled in a rehabilitation programme after an acute coronary syndrome. SETTING: Cardiac rehabilitation unit. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups: (A) moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) at 70% of the maximal HR of the graded maximal exercise test (n = 10); (B) MICE at the maximal 6MWT HR (n = 8); (C) high intensity interval training (HIIT) based on the 6MWT and the 200-mFWT maximal HR (n = 9). Group B and C performed walk tests every 2 weeks, to readjust training HR (THR) if needed. MEASURES: 6MWT and 200-mFWT performances, peak VO2 and peak power (Pmax). RESULTS: 6MWT and 200-mFWT performances improved significantly and similarly in all groups (p < 0.05). Peak VO2 improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05), this improvement being higher in group C (HIIT) versus A (p < 0.05). Group B was closer to the recommended THR during exercise sessions compared to group A. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that using the 6MWT and 200-mFWT HR to individualize MICE or HIIT prescription is feasible in CAD patients, and could lead them closer to THR objective, to similar improvements in walking performance, and greater peak VO2 increase for HIIT. Future randomised studies should investigate long-term effects of programmes prescribed from walk tests HR, especially for HIIT modality.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help