Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Long-term rehabilitation for chronic stroke arm movements: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Cauraugh JH, Naik SK, Lodha N, Coombes SA, Summers JJ
Clinical Rehabilitation 2011 Dec;25(12):1086-1096
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of long-term practice on motor improvements in chronic stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized parallel group controlled study. SETTING: Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida. SUBJECTS: Eighteen individuals who experienced a stroke more than nine months prior to enrolling. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment interventions were bilateral arm movements coupled with active neuromuscular stimulation on the impaired arm for both practice duration groups. The short-term group received one treatment protocol, whereas, over 16 months, the long-term practice group completed 10 treatment protocols. All protocol sessions were 6 hours long (90 minutes 1 day/week/4 weeks) and were separated by 22 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Repeated data collection on three primary outcome measures (ie, Box and Block test, fractionated reaction times, and sustained force production) evaluated motor capabilities across rehabilitation times. RESULTS: Mixed design ANOVAs (group x retention test: 2x4; group x retention test x arm condition: 2x4x2) revealed improved motor capabilities for the long-term practice duration group on each primary measure. At the 16-month delayed retention test, when compared to the short-term group, the long-term group demonstrated: (a) more blocks moved (43 versus 32), (b) faster premotor reaction times (158 versus 208 ms), and (c) higher force production (75 versus 45 N). CONCLUSION: Sixty hours of rehabilitation over 16 months provided by various bilateral arm movements and coupled active stimulation improved motor capabilities in chronic stroke.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help