Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Differential effects of high-frequency versus low-frequency exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease
Nieuwland W, Berkhuysen MA, van Veldhuisen DJ, Brugemann J, Landsman ML, van Sonderen E, Lie KI, Crijns HJ, Rispens P
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000 Jul;36(1):202-207
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the influence of frequency of exercise training during cardiac rehabilitation on functional capacity (ie, peak oxygen consumption (VO2) and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT)) and quality of life (QoL). BACKGROUND: Although the value of cardiac rehabilitation is now well established, the influence of the different program characteristics on outcome has received little attention, and the effect of frequency of exercise training is unclear. Functional capacity is regularly evaluated by peak VO2 but parameters of submaximal exercise capacity such as VAT should also be considered because submaximal exercise capacity is especially important in daily living. METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease (n = 130, 114 men; mean age 52 +/- 9 years) were randomized to either a high- or low-frequency program of six weeks (10 or 2 exercise sessions per week of 2 h, respectively). Functional capacity and QoL were assessed before and after cardiac rehabilitation. Global costs were also compared. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, mean exercise capacity increased in both programs: for high- and low-frequency, respectively: peak VO2 = 15% and 12%, Wmax = 18% and 12%, VAT = 35% and 12% (all p < 0.001). However, when the programs were compared, only VAT increased significantly more during the high-frequency program (p = 0.002). During the high-frequency program, QoL increased slightly more, and more individuals improved in subjective physical functioning (p = 0.014). We observed superiority of the high-frequency program, especially in younger patients. Mean costs were estimated at Euro 4,455 and Euro 2,273, respectively, for the high- and low-frequency programs. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency exercise training is more effective in terms of VAT and QoL, but peak VO2 improves equally in both programs. Younger patients seem to benefit more from the high-frequency training.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help