Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effectiveness of graded activity in patients with non-specific low-back pain: a systematic review [with consumer summary]
van der Giessen RN, Speksnijder CM, Helders PJM
Disability and Rehabilitation 2012;34(13):1070-1076
systematic review

BACKGROUND: Non-specific low-back pain (LBP) is considered a major health and economic problem in western society. Nowadays a common used intervention on non-specific LBP is graded activity (GA). Graded activity developed by Lindstrom et al, consisted of four parts: (i) measurements of functional capacity; (ii) a work-place visit; (iii) back school education and (iv) an individual, sub-maximal, gradually increased exercise program with an operant-conditioning behavioural approach as described by Fordyce et al. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of GA in adults with non-specific LBP on pain, disabilities and return to work. DATA SOURCES: An extensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was conducted in July 2011. REVIEW METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of GA in patients with non-specific LBP were eligible. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the PEDro scale. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted according to van Peppen et al to interpret the outcomes of the included studies. RESULTS: Ten articles were included in this systematic review; these articles described five RCTs (680 patients). The best-evidence synthesis revealed that there was no or insufficient evidence for a positive effect of GA on pain, disabilities and return to work in patients with non-specific LBP. CONCLUSION: Currently there is no or insufficient evidence that GA results in better outcomes of patients with non-specific LBP.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help