Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparative effects of a high-intensity interval warm-up and salbutamol on the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise in asthmatic athletes
Mickleborough TD, Lindley MR, Turner LA
International Journal of Sports Medicine 2007 Jun;28(6):456-462
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Approximately half of all asthmatics become refractory to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) with repeated challenges. Exercise refractoriness has been utilized by asthmatic athletes to reduce the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise prior to competition, and this has led to the observation that some asthmatic athletes can "run through" their asthma. The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of short high-intensity, repeated warm-ups compared with salbutamol (a commonly used inhaled beta2-agonist) on the severity of EIB. Eight moderately trained (VO2peak, 51.9 +/- 2.3 ml/kg/min) recreational asthmatic athletes with documented EIB were tested under 4 experimental conditions: (1) control (CON) condition; (2) an interval warm-up (WU) consisting of 8x30-sec runs at peak treadmill speed, with 45-sec recovery between each sprint; (3) inhaling 200 microg of salbutamol (Ventolin, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK) (IH); and (4) combining both the WU and IH session. All 4 experimental sessions were followed by an exercise challenge test (85 to 90% predicted maximum heart rate for 8 min). Pulmonary function was measured pre-exercise and at 1, 5, 10, 15 min postexercise. The mean maximum percent fall in pre- to postexercise forced expiratory volume in 1-sec (FEV1) for all 8 asthmatic subjects during the EIB screening test (CON session) was -18.25 +/- 4.01%. The mean maximum percent decrease in postexercise FEV1 significantly decreased (p < 0.05) to only -9.1 +/- 0.6% following the WU condition, which is below the EIB diagnostic threshold of a 10% fall in postexercise FEV1. The IH and WU+IH condition resulted in a substantial postexercise bronchodilation as shown by a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the mean maximum percent change in postexercise FEV1 following the IH (+8.9 +/- 6.1%) and WU+IH (+15.2 +/- 4.6%) condition. Similar changes as a result of experimental condition were observed for FEF[25-75%]. These data indicate that repeated high-intensity warm-ups can lessen the bronchoconstrictor response to exercise. In addition, combining the interval warm-up with salbutamol prior to exercise resulted in substantial bronchodilation and conferred a greater protective effect against developing EIB than either intervention alone.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help