Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effect of a home leisure education program after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Carbonneau H, Fontaine L, Viscogliosi C, Bravo G |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007 Sep;88(9):1095-1100 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a leisure education program on participation in and satisfaction with leisure activities (leisure-related outcomes), and well-being, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (primary outcomes) after stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home and community. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two people with stroke. INTERVENTION: Experimental participants (n = 33) received the leisure education program at home once a week for 8 to 12 weeks. Control participants (n = 29) were visited at home at a similar frequency. Participants were evaluated before and after the program by a blinded assessor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from preintervention to postintervention in: minutes of leisure activity per day, number of leisure activities, the Leisure Satisfaction Scale, the Individualized Leisure Profile, the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS), the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile (SA-SIP30). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in change scores between the groups for satisfaction with leisure with a mean difference of 11.9 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2 to 19.5) and participation in active leisure with a mean difference of 14.0 minutes (95% CI 3.2 to 24.9). There was also a statistically significant difference between groups for improvement in depressive symptoms with a mean difference of -7.2 (95% CI -12.5 to -1.9). Differences between groups were not statistically significant on the SA-SIP30 (0.2; 95% CI -1.3 to 1.8) and GWBS (2.2; 95% CI -5.6 to 10.0). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the effectiveness of the leisure education program for improving participation in leisure activities, improving satisfaction with leisure and reducing depression in people with stroke.
|