Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke [with consumer summary]
Sullivan JE, Hurley D, Hedman LD
Clinical Rehabilitation 2012 Nov;26(11):1010-1020
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Sensory amplitude electrical stimulation (SES) and repetitive task practice reduce impairments and arm dysfunction when delivered separately following stroke. OBJECTIVE: To determine if home-based, task-specific arm exercise was more effective when administered concurrent with SES. METHODS: Thirty-eight subjects with chronic stroke and mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score 28/66 (15 to 45) participated. Subjects were randomly assigned to an SES (n = 20) or sham stimulation (n = 18) group. Subjects engaged in task-based home exercise for 30 minutes, twice daily, for four weeks while wearing a glove electrode on the impaired hand. Experimental subjects received SES while control subjects received sham stimulation during exercise. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: FMA and Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT). RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences for outcome measures. There was a significant difference between the pre- and post-test scores in the SES group AMAT median time (p = 0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.304 to -6.365; effect size 0.84). Practice time was not associated with changes in outcomes. Subjects with more sensorimotor dysfunction had significantly greater improvements on AMAT median time (p = 0.037). There was a significant relationship between baseline FMA score and FMA change score (r = 0.402; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a unique SES delivery system via glove electrode that enabled delivery of SES during home-based arm task practice in stroke survivors. Task practice with concurrent SES did not demonstrate significantly better effects than task practice with sham stimulation, however there was a trend for greater improvement in one activity measure.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help