Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Han C, Wang Q, Meng P-P, Qi M-Z |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Jan;27(1):75-81 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different intensities of arm rehabilitation training on the functional recovery of hemiplegic upper extremity. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-two stroke patients meeting the enrolment criteria were randomly divided into three groups: group A (n = 11), group B (n = 10) and group C (n = 11). Each group received arm training for 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours a day respectively, 5 days per week, for a period of six weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Motor function was assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test and Barthel Index, carried out before treatment, two weeks, four weeks and six weeks after treatment. RESULTS: When comparing the three groups, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment improvement was more significant in group C (20.50 +/- 7.84) than that in group A (11.90 +/- 6.52) and group B (13.80 +/- 6.41) after four weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). The Action Research Arm Test score improvement was more significant in group C (7.30 +/- 2.95) than in group A (3.30 +/- 2.91) (p < 0.05). After six weeks of treatment, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Action Research Arm Test score improvements were more significant in group C (24.50 +/- 7.96, 10.90 +/- 3.60) and group B (19.70 +/- 7.09, 8.70 +/- 4.62) than in group A (13.00 +/- 6.38, 5.30 +/- 3.40) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences of Barthel Index among the three groups (p > 0.05). In each group, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test and Barthel Index scores increased significantly after six weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the intensity of arm training might improve the motor function of the arm after stroke.
|