Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Han C, Wang Q, Meng P-P, Qi M-Z |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Jan;27(1):75-81 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different intensities of arm rehabilitation training on the functional recovery of hemiplegic upper extremity. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-two stroke patients meeting the enrolment criteria were randomly divided into three groups: group A (n = 11), group B (n = 10) and group C (n = 11). Each group received arm training for 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours a day respectively, 5 days per week, for a period of six weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Motor function was assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test and Barthel Index, carried out before treatment, two weeks, four weeks and six weeks after treatment. RESULTS: When comparing the three groups, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment improvement was more significant in group C (20.50 +/- 7.84) than that in group A (11.90 +/- 6.52) and group B (13.80 +/- 6.41) after four weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). The Action Research Arm Test score improvement was more significant in group C (7.30 +/- 2.95) than in group A (3.30 +/- 2.91) (p < 0.05). After six weeks of treatment, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Action Research Arm Test score improvements were more significant in group C (24.50 +/- 7.96, 10.90 +/- 3.60) and group B (19.70 +/- 7.09, 8.70 +/- 4.62) than in group A (13.00 +/- 6.38, 5.30 +/- 3.40) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences of Barthel Index among the three groups (p > 0.05). In each group, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test and Barthel Index scores increased significantly after six weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the intensity of arm training might improve the motor function of the arm after stroke.
|