Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
(Effect of respiratory muscle gymnastics on lung function and quality of life in the old patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) [Chinese - simplified characters] |
Sun J-X, Yin M-X, Shao H, Li Z-S, Li S-W |
Zhongguo Linchuang Kangfu [Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation] 2003 Nov 5;7(27):3698-3699 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
AIM: To observe the effect of respiratory muscle gymnastics on lung function and quality of life in the old patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Eighty-nine COPD stable patients were randomly divided into two groups: respiratory muscle gymnastics (A group, n = 45) and non respiratory muscle gymnastics (B group, n = 44). Patients in A group were teached methods of respiratory muscle gymnastics (retract lips, abdominal breathing and respiratory muscle gymnastics) by the special physician and regular follow-up. The indexes to lung function (forced expiration volume(FEV1), the value of FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) %), blood gas analysis marker PaO2, PaCO2 and quality of life were measured at the beginning and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: By 6 months after treatment, compared of two group showed significant differences in lung function (FEV1, FEV1/FVC% and PaCO2 1.8 +/- 0.7 L, 69.5 +/- 12.1% and 5.4 +/- 0.4 kPa in group A; 1.5 +/- 0.6 L, 56.4 +/- 11.5%, and 7.0 +/- 0.7 kPa in group B; t = 2.47, 2.38 and 2.56, p < 0.05), PaO2 (11.5 +/- 0.8 kPa in group A; 8.5 +/- 0.9 kPa in group B; t = 3.54, p < 0.01) had very significant differences. The scores of quality of life in two group showed significant differences (divided into F1, F2, F3 and F4 were 2.10 +/- 0.26, 2.18 +/- 0.28, 2.11 +/- 0.23, 2.09 +/- 0.25, 2.26 +/- 0.29 in group A; 2.37 +/- 0.34, 2.31 +/- 0.30, 2.32 +/- 0.32, 2.41 +/- 0.35, 2.46 +/- 0.38 in group B; t = 2.41, 2.52, 2.39, 2.62, 2.35, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The lung function of ventilation and quality of life of in the old patients with COPD can be significantly improved by respiratory muscle gymnastics.
|