Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Cho H-Y, Kim J-S, Lee G-C |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2012 Aug;27(8):675-680 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of motor imagery training on the balance and gait abilities of post-stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight individuals with chronic stroke. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group (n = 15) performed motor imagery training involving imagining normal gait movement for 15 minutes embedded in gait training for 30 minutes (45 minutes/day, 3 times/week); the control group (n = 13) performed gait training only (30 minutes/day, 3 times/week). MAIN MEASURES: Balance and gait abilities were measured by the Functional Reach Test, Timed Up-and-Go Test, 10-m Walk Test and Fugl-Meyer assessment before and after interventions. REUSLTS: All measurements improved significantly compared with baseline values in the experimental group. In the control group, there were significant improvements in all parameters except the Fugl-Meyer assessment. All parameters of the experimental group increased significantly compared to those of the control group as follows: Functional Reach Test (control versus experimental: 28.1 +/- 3.1 versus 37.51 +/- 3.0), Timed Up-and-Go Test (20.7 +/- 4.0 versus 13.2 +/- 2.2), 10-m Walk Test (17.4 +/- 4.6 versus 16.0 +/- 2.7) and Fugl-Meyer assessment (12.0 +/- 2.9 versus 17.6 +/- 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Gait training with motor imagery training improves the balance and gait abilities of chronic stroke patients significantly better than gait training alone.
|