Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Portable upper extremity robotics is as efficacious as upper extremity rehabilitative therapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial [with consumer summary] | 
| Page SJ, Hill V, White S | 
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Jun;27(6):494-503 | 
| clinical trial | 
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* | 
| OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a repetitive task-specific practice regimen integrating a portable, electromyography-controlled brace called the 'Myomo' versus usual care repetitive task-specific practice in subjects with chronic, moderate upper extremity impairment. SUBJECTS: Sixteen subjects (7 males; mean age 57.0 +/- 11.02 years; mean time post stroke 75.0 +/- 87.63 months; 5 left-sided strokes) exhibiting chronic, stable, moderate upper extremity impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were administered repetitive task-specific practice in which they participated in valued, functional tasks using their paretic upper extremities. Both groups were supervised by a therapist and were administered therapy targeting their paretic upper extremities that was 30 minutes in duration, occurring 3 days/week for eight weeks. One group participated in repetitive task-specific practice entirely while wearing the portable robotic, while the other performed the same activity regimen manually. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The upper extremity Fugl-Meyer, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Stroke Impact Scale were administered on two occasions before intervention and once after intervention. RESULTS: After intervention, groups exhibited nearly identical Fugl-Meyer score increases of approximately 2.1 points; the group using robotics exhibited larger score changes on all but one of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Stroke Impact Scale subscales, including a 12.5-point increase on the Stroke Impact Scale recovery subscale. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that therapist-supervised repetitive task-specific practice integrating robotics is as efficacious as manual practice in subjects with moderate upper extremity impairment.  
 |