Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The value of adding mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Invernizzi M, Negrini S, Carda S, Lanzotti L, Cisari C, Baricich A |
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2013 Jun;49(3):311-317 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Upper limb paresis remains a relevant challenge in stroke rehabilitation. AIM: To evaluate if adding mirror therapy (MT) to conventional therapy (CT) can improve motor recovery of the upper limb in subacute stroke patients. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: Subacute stroke patients referred to a Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit between October 2009 and August 2011. POPULATION: Twenty-six subacute stroke patients (time from stroke < 4 weeks) with upper limb paresis (Motricity Index <= 77). METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to the MT (n = 13) or to the CT group (n = 13). Both followed a comprehensive rehabilitative treatment. In addition, MT group had 30 minutes of MT while the CT group had 30 minutes of sham therapy. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was the primary outcome measures. Motricity Index (MI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: After one month of treatment patients of both groups showed statistically significant improvements in all the variables measured (p < 0.05). Moreover patients of the MT group had greater improvements in the ARAT, MI and FIM values compared to CT group (p < 0.01, Glass's delta effect size 1.18). No relevant adverse event was recorded during the study. CONCLUSION: MT is a promising and easy method to improve motor recovery of the upper limb in subacute stroke patients.
|