Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Pilates exercise or stationary cycling for chronic non-specific low back pain: does it matter? A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up [with consumer summary]
Marshall PWM, Kennedy S, Brooks C, Lonsdale C
Spine 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E952-E959
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: This is the companion study to a previous publication that presented 8-week pain, disability, and trunk muscle motor control results. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of 8-weeks of specific trunk exercises and stationary cycling on outcomes measures of catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs (FAB) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP), and provide 6-month outcome data for all self-report measures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is thought that any form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is sufficient to address catastrophizing and FAB, and concomitant levels of pain and disability. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with LBP were randomly assigned to 8-weeks of specific trunk exercise (SEG), or stationary cycling (CEG). Self-rated pain, disability, catastrophizing and FAB scores were collected before, immediately after (8-weeks), and 6-months after the training program. Clinically meaningful improvements were defined as greater than a 30% reduction from baseline in pain and disability scores. Intention-to-treat principles were used for missing data. Per-protocol analysis was performed on participants who attended at least 2/3 of the exercise sessions. RESULTS: At 8-weeks, disability was significantly lower in the SEG compared to the CEG (d = 0.62, p = 0.018). Pain was reduced from baseline in both groups following training (p < 0.05), but was lower for the SEG (p < 0.05). FAB scores were reduced in the SEG at 8-weeks, and in the CEG at 6-months. No between-group differences in FAB scores were observed. Similar reductions in catastrophizing in each group were observed at each time-point. At 6-months, the overall data pattern suggested no long-term difference between-groups. Per-protocol analysis of clinically meaningful improvements suggest no between-group differences for how many patients are likely to report improvement. CONCLUSION: Inferential statistics suggest greater improvements at 8-weeks, but not 6-months, for the SEG. Inspection of clinically meaningful changes based on a minimum level of adherence suggests no between-group differences. If a LBP patient adheres to either specific trunk exercises or stationary cycling, it is reasonable to believe similar improvements will be achieved.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help