Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Study to assess the effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke subjects: a randomized controlled trial |
Singh P, Pradhan B |
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 2013 Apr-Jun;16(2):180-184 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of modified constraint induced movement therapy (m-CIMT) in stroke subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of forty sub-acute stroke subjects were randomly assigned to either a m-CIMT (n = 20) or in a control group (n = 20). The m-CIMT group (14 men, 6 women; mean age 55.2 years) consisted of structured 2 h therapy sessions emphasizing affected arm use, occurring 5 times/week for 2 weeks. A mitt was used to restrain the unaffected arm for 10 h/day for 2 week. The control group (11 men, 9 women; mean age 56.4 years) consisted of conventional rehabilitation for time-matched exercise program. The outcome measures were evaluated at pre- and post-intervention by using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) of motor recovery after stroke. RESULTS: After intervention significant effects were observed in m-CIMT group on WMFT (pre-test and post-test score was 28.04 +/- 6.58, 13.59 +/- 2.86; p = 0.003). Similarly on FMA (pre- and post-test score was 31.15 +/- 6.37, 55.7 +/- 6.4; p = 0.00). CONCLUSION: There is a significant improvement in upper extremity function so it indicates that m-CIMT is effective in improving the motor function of the affected arm in stroke subjects. However, its long-term effect has not proved since there was no follow-up after intervention.
|