Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Does altering inclination alter effectiveness of treadmill training for gait impairment after stroke? A randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Carda S, Invernizzi M, Baricich A, Cognolato G, Cisari C |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 Oct;27(10):932-938 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a downhill walking training programme is more effective than the same amount of training applied uphill in chronic stroke survivors. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation service. METHODS: Thirty-eight adults with hemiplegia from stroke lasting more than three months were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: 'UP' -- 45 minutes of physical therapy plus 30 minutes of treadmill with 5% ascending slope; and 'DOWN' -- 45 minutes of physical therapy plus 30 minutes of treadmill with 5% descending slope. Both groups were treated 5 times a week for six weeks. Patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment and after three months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the number of patients showing an improvement in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) greater than 50 m. Secondary outcome measures were: (1) number of patients showing a clinically relevant improvement of gait speed during 10-m walking test (10mWT); (2) number of patients showing an improvement in timed up and go (TUG) greater than minimal detectable change. RESULTS: Both groups had a significant improvement after treatment and at follow-up. At the end of treatment, compared to UP group, more patients in the DOWN group showed clinically significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes (16/19 patients for 6MWT, 11/19 patients for 10mWT and 9/19 patients for TUG compared with 3/19, 4/19 and 2/19 patients, respectively, p < 0.01). At follow-up, results were similar except for 10mWT. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic stroke patients, downhill treadmill training produces a bigger effect than uphill training.
|