Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper-limb spasticity and impairment in patients with spastic hemiparesis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study |
Krewer C, Hartl S, Muller F, Koenig E |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014 Jun;95(6):1039-1047 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate short-term and long-term effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rpMS) on spasticity and motor function. DESIGN: Monocentric randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Neurologic rehabilitation hospital PARTICIPANTS: 66 patients with severe hemiparesis and mild to moderate spasticity due to a stroke or a traumatic brain injury. On average, time since injury was 26 or 37 weeks for the intervention groups with a standard deviation of 71 and 82, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: RpMS for 20 min or sham stimulation with subsequently occupational therapy for 20 min, two times a day over a 2-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Modified Tardieu scale and Fugl-Meyer assessment (arm score), assessed before therapy, at the end of the 2-week treatment period, and 2 weeks after study treatment. Additionally, the Tardieu scale was assessed after the 1st and before the 3rd therapy session to determine any short-term effects. RESULTS: Spasticity (Tardieu > 0) was present in 83% of wrist flexors, 62% of elbow flexors, 44% of elbow extensors, and 10% of wrist extensors. Compared to the sham stimulation group the rpMS group showed short-term effects on spasticity for wrist flexors (p = 0.048), and long-term effects for elbow extensors (p < 0.045). Arm motor function (rpMS group median 5 (4 to 27); sham group 4 (4 to 9)) did not significantly change over the study period in either group, whereas rpMS had a positive effect on sensory function. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with rpMS increases sensory function in patients with severe limb paresis. The magnetic stimulation has, however, limited effect on spasticity and no effect on motor function.
|