Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Does cardiac rehabilitation after an acute cardiac syndrome lead to changes in physical activity habits? A systematic review
ter Hoeve N, Huisstede BMA, Stam HJ, van Domburg RT, Sunamura M, van den Berg-Emons RJG
Physical Therapy 2015 Feb;95(2):167-179
systematic review

BACKGROUND: Optimal physical activity levels have health benefits for patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and are an important goal of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). PURPOSE: To systematically review literature regarding short-term (< 6 months after completion of CR) and long-term effects (>= 6 months after completion) of standard CR on physical activity levels in patients with ACS. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and PEDro were systematically searched from 1990 till 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating CR for patients with ACS reporting physical activity level. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently selected articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Result were summarized with a best-evidence synthesis. Results were categorized in: (1) centre-based/home-based CR versus no intervention, (2) comparison of different durations of CR, (3) comparison of two types of CR. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 26 RCTs was included. Compared to no intervention, there was at most conflicting evidence for centre-based CR and moderate evidence for home-based CR for short-term effectiveness. Limited and no evidence was found for long-term maintenance for centre-based and home-based CR respectively. When directly compared to centre-based CR, moderate evidence showed that home-based CR has better long-term effects. There was no clear evidence that increasing training volume, extending duration of CR or adding an extra intervention to CR is more effective. LIMITATIONS: Because of variety in included RCTs in CR interventions and outcome measures, pooling of data was not possible. Therefore, we used a best-evidence synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: It would appear that centre-based CR is not sufficient to improve and maintain physical activity habits. Home-based programmes might be more successful, but literature on this is limited. More research on finding successful interventions to improve activity habits is needed.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help