Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Getting on with the rest of your life following stroke: a randomized trial of a complex intervention aimed at enhancing life participation post stroke [with consumer summary] |
Mayo NE, Anderson S, Barclay R, Cameron JI, Desrosiers J, Eng JJ, Huijbregts M, Kagan A, Lyons MM, Moriello C, Richards CL, Salbach NM, Scott SC, Teasell R, Bayley M |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2015 Dec;29(12):1198-1211 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To enhance participation post stroke through a structured, community-based program. DESIGN: A controlled trial with random allocation to immediate or four-month delayed entry. SETTING: Eleven community sites in seven Canadian cities. SUBJECTS: Community dwelling persons within five years of stroke onset, cognitively intact, able to toilet independently. INTERVENTIONS: Evidence-based program delivered in three 12-week sessions including exercise and project-based activities, done as individuals and in groups. MAIN MEASURES: Hours spent per week in meaningful activities outside of the home and Reintegration to Normal Living Index; Stroke-Specific Geriatric Depression Scale, Apathy Scale, gait speed, EuroQuol EQ-5D, and Preference-Based Stroke Index. All measures were transformed to a scale from 0 to 100. Assessments prior to randomization, after the first session at three months, six months, 12 months, and 15 months. RESULTS: A total of 186 persons were randomized. The between-group analysis showed no disadvantage to waiting and so groups were combined and a within-person analysis was carried out at three time points. There were statistically significant increases in all study outcomes on average over all persons. Over 45% of people met or exceeded the pre-specified target of a three hour per week increase in meaningful activity and this most often took a full year of intervention to achieve. Greatest gains were in satisfaction with community integration (mean 4.78; 95% CI 2.01 to 7.55) and stroke-specific health-related quality of life (mean 4.14; 95% CI 2.31 to 5.97). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based programs targeting participation are feasible and effective, but stroke survivors require time to achieve meaningful gains.
|