Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study |
Angadi SS, Mookadam F, Lee CD, Tucker WJ, Haykowsky MJ, Gaesser GA |
Journal of Applied Physiology 2015 Sep;119(6):753-758 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Exercise training is an established adjuvant therapy in heart failure; however, the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in HFpEF are unknown. We compared the effects of HIIT versus moderate-intensity aerobic continuous training (MI-ACT) on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and endothelial function in patients with HFpEF. Nineteen patients with HFpEF (age 70 +/- 8.3 yr) were randomized to either HIIT (4x4 min at 85 to 90% peak heart rate, with 3 min active recovery) or MI-ACT (30 min at 70% peak heart rate). Fifteen patients completed exercise training (HIIT n = 9; MI-ACT n = 6). Patients trained 3 days/wk for 4 wk. Before and after training patients underwent a treadmill test for VO2peak determination, 2D-echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) for assessment of endothelial function. HIIT improved VO2peak (pre 19.2 +/- 5.2 ml/kg/min; post 21.0 +/- 5.2 ml/kg/min; p = 0.04) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grade (pre 2.1 +/- 0.3; post 1.3 +/- 0.7; p = 0.02), but FMD was unchanged (pre 6.9 +/- 3.7%; post 7.0 +/- 4.2%). No changes were observed following MI-ACT. A trend for reduced left atrial volume index was observed following HIIT compared with MI-ACT (-3.3 +/- 6.6 versus +5.8 +/- 10.7 ml/m2; p = 0.06). In HFpEF patients 4 wk of HIIT significantly improved VO2peak and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. HIIT may provide a more robust stimulus than MI-ACT for early exercise training adaptations in HFpEF.
|