Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Clinical response and relapse in patients with chronic low back pain following osteopathic manual treatment: results from the OSTEOPATHIC Trial
Licciardone JC, Aryal S
Manual Therapy 2014 Dec;19(6):541-548
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Clinical response and relapse following a regimen of osteopathic manual treatment (OMT) were assessed in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) within the OSTEOPATHIC trial, a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Initial clinical response and subsequent stability of response, including final response and relapse status at week 12, were determined in 186 patients with high baseline pain severity (>= 50 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale). Substantial improvement in LBP, defined as 50% or greater pain reduction relative to baseline, was used to assess clinical response at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Sixty-two (65%) patients in the OMT group attained an initial clinical response versus 41 (45%) patients in the sham OMT group (risk ratio (RR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 1.90). The median time to initial clinical response to OMT in these patients was 4 weeks. Among patients with an initial clinical response prior to week 12, 13 (24%) patients in the OMT group versus 18 (51%) patients in the sham OMT group relapsed (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.83). Overall, 49 (52%) patients in the OMT group attained or maintained a clinical response at week 12 versus 23 (25%) patients in the sham OMT group (RR 2.04; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.05). The large effect size for short-term efficacy of OMT was driven by stable responders who did not relapse.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help