Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Short-term effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle architecture of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius in children with cerebral palsy: preliminary results of a prospective controlled study
Karabay I, Ozturk GT, Malas FU, Kara M, Tiftik T, Ersoz M, Ozcakar L
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2015 Sep;94(9):728-733
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the short-term effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation application on tibialis anterior (stimulated muscle) and gastrocnemius (antagonist) muscles' size and architecture in children with cerebral palsy by using ultrasound. DESIGN: This prospective, controlled study included 28 children diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Participants were treated either with neuromuscular electrical stimulation application and conventional physiotherapy (group A) or with conventional physiotherapy alone (group B). Outcome was evaluated by clinical (gross motor function, selective motor control, range of motion, spasticity) and ultrasonographic (cross-sectional area, pennation angle, fascicle length of tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles) measurements before and after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: Cross-sectional area values of tibialis anterior (238.7 +/- 61.5 versus 282.0 +/- 67.1 mm) and gastrocnemius (207.9 +/- 48.0 versus 229.5 +/- 52.4 mm) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) muscles were increased after treatment in group A. Cross-sectional area values of tibialis anterior muscle were decreased (257.3 +/- 64.7 versus 239.7 +/- 60.0 mm) after treatment in group B (p < 0.001), and the rest of the measurements were found not to have changed significantly in either group. CONCLUSIONS: These results have shown that cross-sectional area of both the agonist and antagonist muscles increased after 20 sessions of neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment. Future studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are definitely awaited for better evaluation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation application on muscle architecture and its possible correlates in clinical/functional outcome.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help