Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Economic evaluation of combined diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk: a systematic review for the community preventive services task force |
Li R, Qu S, Zhang P, Chattopadhyay S, Gregg EW, Albright A, Hopkins D, Pronk NP |
Annals of Internal Medicine 2015 Sep 15;163(6):452-460 |
systematic review |
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a highly prevalent and costly disease. Studies indicate that combined diet and physical activity promotion programs can prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk. PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the evidence on cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit estimates of diet and physical activity promotion programs. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, EconLit, and CINAHL through 7 April 2015. STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies from high-income countries that provided data on cost, cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit ratios of diet and physical activity promotion programs with at least 2 sessions over at least 3 months delivered to persons at increased risk for type 2 diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual abstraction and assessment of relevant study details. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies were included. Costs were expressed in 2013 US dollars. The median program cost per participant was $653. Costs were lower for group-based programs (median $417) and programs implemented in community or primary care settings (median $424) than for the US DPP (Diabetes Prevention Program) trial and the DPP Outcomes Study ($5,881). Twenty-two studies assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the programs. From a health system perspective, 16 studies reported a median ICER of $13,761 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Group-based programs were more cost-effective (median $1,819 per QALY) than those that used individual sessions (median $15,846 per QALY). No cost-benefit studies were identified. LIMITATION: Information on recruitment costs and cost-effectiveness of translational programs implemented in community and primary care settings was limited. CONCLUSION: Diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes are cost-effective among persons at increased risk. Costs are lower when programs are delivered to groups in community or primary care settings. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
|