Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of three popular exercise modalities on VO2max in overweight and obese
Baekkerud FH, Solberg F, Leinan IM, Wisloff U, Karlsen T, Rognmo O
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2016 Mar;48(3):491-498
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: In this prospective randomized trial, we examined the effect of three popular exercise training modalities on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in overweight and obese individuals. In addition, we examined possible concomitant adaptations in endurance exercise performance (time to exhaustion (TTE)), citrate synthase (CS) activity, venous and arterial function, blood volume, and calculated stroke volume (SV). METHODS: Thirty subjects were recruited (age 41 +/- 9 yr; weight 91 +/- 14 kg; height 173 +/- 8 cm; body mass index 30 +/- 4 kgm) and randomized to either 6 wk of 4x4-min high-intensity interval training (4HIIT) at 85% to 95% of HRmax, 10x1-min HIIT (1HIIT) at VO2max load, or 45-min moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) at 70% of HRmax. VO2max, TTE, CS activity, venous and arterial function, as well as blood volume were measured before and after the training period. O2 pulse was calculated and used to estimate SV. Analysis was conducted per protocol. RESULTS: Only 4HIIT increased VO2max (p < 0.01) and significantly more compared with 1HIIT (p = 0.04) and MICT (p = 0.03) (4HIIT 10%; 1HIIT 3.3%; and MICT 3.1%). All groups increased TTE (4HIIT 198%; 1HIIT 116%; MICT 52%), with a higher increase after 4HIIT compared with that after MICT (p = 0.02). Calculated SV increased only after 4HIIT (14.4%). Plasma volume and hemoglobin mass increased after 1HIIT only (5.6% and 6.5%); however, no group differences were found. All groups increased CS activity (4HIIT 35%; 1HIIT 35%; MICT 56%), with no group differences. Arterial inflow (15.7%) and venous outflow (22.7%) decreased after MICT, but there were no group differences. CONCLUSIONS: 4HIIT was superior to 1HIIT and MICT in improving VO2max likely because of an increased SV.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help