Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Three combinations of manual therapy techniques within naprapathy in the treatment of neck and/or back pain: a randomized controlled trial
Paanalahti K, Holm LW, Nordin M, Hoijer J, Lyander J, Asker M, Skillgate E
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2016 Apr 23;17(176):Epub
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Manual therapy as spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, stretching and massage are common treatment methods for neck and back pain. The objective was to compare the treatment effect on pain intensity, pain related disability and perceived recovery from (a) naprapathic manual therapy (spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, stretching and massage) to (b) naprapathic manual therapy without spinal manipulation and to (c) naprapathic manual therapy without stretching for male and female patients seeking care for back and/or neck pain. METHOD: Participants were recruited among patients, ages 18 to 65, seeking care at the educational clinic of Naprapathogskolan -- the Scandinavian College of Naprapathic Manual Medicine in Stockholm. The patients (n = 1,057) were randomized to one of three treatment arms (a) manual therapy (ie, spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, stretching and massage), (b) manual therapy excluding spinal manipulation and (c) manual therapy excluding stretching. The primary outcomes were minimal clinically important improvement in pain intensity and pain related disability. Treatments were provided by naprapath students in the seventh semester of eight total semesters. Generalized estimating equations and logistic regression were used to examine the association between the treatments and the outcomes. RESULTS: At 12 weeks follow-up, 64% had a minimal clinically important improvement in pain intensity and 42% in pain related disability. The corresponding chances to be improved at the 52 weeks follow-up were 58% and 40% respectively. No systematic differences in effect when excluding spinal manipulation and stretching respectively from the treatment were found over 1 year follow-up, concerning minimal clinically important improvement in pain intensity (p = 0.41) and pain related disability (p = 0.85) and perceived recovery (p = 0.98). Neither were there disparities in effect when male and female patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSION: The effect of manual therapy for male and female patients seeking care for neck and/or back pain at an educational clinic is similar regardless if spinal manipulation or if stretching is excluded from the treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN92249294.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help