Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Inspiratory muscle training to enhance recovery from mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial [with consumer summary]
Bissett BM, Leditschke IA, Neeman T, Boots R, Paratz J
Thorax 2016 Sep;71(9):812-819
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: In patients who have been mechanically ventilated, inspiratory muscles remain weak and fatigable following ventilatory weaning, which may contribute to dyspnoea and limited functional recovery. Inspiratory muscle training may improve inspiratory muscle strength and endurance following weaning, potentially improving dyspnoea and quality of life in this patient group. METHODS: We conducted a randomised trial with assessor-blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. Following 48 hours of successful weaning, 70 participants (mechanically ventilated >= 7 days) were randomised to receive inspiratory muscle training once daily 5 days/week for 2 weeks in addition to usual care, or usual care (control). Primary endpoints were inspiratory muscle strength and fatigue resistance index (FRI) 2 weeks following enrolment. Secondary endpoints included dyspnoea, physical function and quality of life, post-intensive care length of stay and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 34 participants were randomly allocated to the training group and 36 to control. The training group demonstrated greater improvements in inspiratory strength (training 17%, control 6%, mean difference 11%, p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in FRI (0.03 versus 0.02, p = 0.81), physical function (0.25 versus 0.25, p = 0.97) or dyspnoea (-0.5 versus 0.2, p = 0.22). Improvement in quality of life was greater in the training group (14% versus 2%, mean difference 12%, p = 0.03). In-hospital mortality was higher in the training group (4 versus 0, 12% versus 0%, p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Inspiratory muscle training following successful weaning increases inspiratory muscle strength and quality of life, but we cannot confidently rule out an associated increased risk of in-hospital mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12610001089022.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help