Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
The effect of antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese on emotional well-being: the LIMIT randomized trial [with consumer summary] |
Dodd JM, Newman A, Moran LJ, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Yelland LN, Crowther CA, McPhee AJ, Wittert G, Owens JA, Turnbull D, Robinson JS, for the LIMIT randomised trial group |
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2016 Mar;95(3):309-318 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of dietary and lifestyle advice given to women who were overweight or obese during pregnancy on maternal quality of life, anxiety and risk of depression, and satisfaction with care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial, involving pregnant women with body mass index > 25 kg/m2, recruited from maternity units in South Australia. Women were randomized to lifestyle advice or standard care, and completed questionnaires assessing risk of depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), anxiety (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and quality of life (SF-36) at trial entry, 28 and 36 weeks' gestation, and 4 months postpartum. Secondary trial outcomes assessed for this analysis were risk of depression, anxiety, maternal quality of life, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: One or more questionnaires were completed by 976 of 1,108 (90.8%) women receiving Lifestyle Advice and 957 of 1,104 (89.7%) women receiving Standard Care. The risk of depression (adjusted risk ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.24; p = 0.95), anxiety (adjusted risk ratio 1.09; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.27; p = 0.31), and health-related quality of life were similar between the two groups. Women receiving Lifestyle Advice reported improved healthy food choice (lifestyle advice 404 (68.9%) versus standard care 323 (51.8%); p < 0.0001), and exercise knowledge (lifestyle advice 444 (75.8%) versus standard care 367 (58.8%); p < 0.0001), and reassurance about their health (lifestyle advice 499 (85.3%) versus standard care 485 (77.9%); p = 0.0112), and health of their baby (lifestyle advice 527 (90.2%) versus standard care 545 (87.6%); p = 0.0143). CONCLUSION: Lifestyle advice in pregnancy improved knowledge and provided reassurance without negatively impacting well-being.
|