Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effect of body-weight suspension training versus treadmill training on gross motor abilities of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy [with consumer summary] |
Emara HA, el-Gohary TM, al-Johany AA |
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2016 Jun;52(3):356-363 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Suspension training and treadmill training are commonly used for promoting functional gross motor skills in children with cerebral palsy. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of body-weight suspension training versus treadmill training on gross motor functional skills. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled intervention study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation facility. POPULATION: Twenty children with spastic diplegia (7 boys and 13 girls) in the age ranged from 6 to 8 years old were randomly allocated into two equal groups. All children were assessed at baseline, after 18-session and after 36-session. METHODS: During the twelve-week outpatient rehabilitation program, both groups received traditional therapeutic exercises. Additionally, one group received locomotor training using the treadmill while the other group received locomotor training using body-weight suspension through the dynamic spider cage. Assessment included dimensions "D" standing and "E" walking of the gross motor function measure, in addition to the 10-m Walking Test and the five times sit to stand test. Training was applied three times per week for twelve consecutive weeks. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in standing or walking ability for measurements taken at baseline or after 18-session of therapy. Measurements taken at 36-session showed that suspension training achieved significantly (p < 0.05) higher average score than treadmill training for dimension D as well as for dimension E. No significant difference was found between suspension training and treadmill training regarding walking speed or sit to stand transitional skills. CONCLUSIONS: Body-weight suspension training is effective in improving walking and locomotor capabilities in children with spastic diplegia. After three month suspension training was superior to treadmill training.
|